Lotus Europa Community

Lotus Europa Forums => Garage => Topic started by: Grumblebuns on Monday,January 19, 2015, 01:52:11 PM

Title: Timing the twin cam
Post by: Grumblebuns on Monday,January 19, 2015, 01:52:11 PM
This is a topic that I've been ignoring longer than I should have due to ignorance and lack of experience. I'm trying to figure out where I should set my timing. Obviously I have it in the ballpark since it runs OK.

First question is what is "static timing"? Is it timing at idle?

I took a timing light to my TCS after the morning run and addling around 1100-1200 RPM, I'm roughly 25-30 degrees. I'm assuming that the variation is called scatter. So anybody know where I'm at? I'm thinking that I'm pretty far advanced at idle since timing will advance with increasing RPM.

Second question is which direction do you rotate the distributor to retard the timing?

Joji Tokumoto
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: TCS4605R on Monday,January 19, 2015, 04:29:37 PM
Joji,

Static timing is done with the engine OFF.  Connect the power lead of a 12 volt lamp to the low tension lead on the distributor and the ground lead of the 12 volt lamp to the engine block or a good ground point.  Rotate the engine until the #1 piston is a Top Dead Center (TDC) on the compression stroke, then back the crank off counter clockwise about 30 degrees.  Take all of the plug wires off so the next procedure does not let the engine start.  The next procedure, switch the engine ON and put the car in 1st gear and slowly rock the car forward.  When the 12 volt lamp comes on, the distributor points have just opened - this is your static timing point.  Look down the hole in the transaxle bell housing and you should see the edge of the flywheel with timing marks on it - read the timing - could be 5, 10 or 15 degrees before TDC.  The Lotus shop manual says 5 degrees before TDC for Zenith-Stromberg carbs and 12 degrees before TDC for Dellorto or Weber carbs.  Static timing will get you in the 'ballpark' for ignition timing - the best way is with a timing light.

My engine has Webers carbs and 'L' cams - I use a timing light and set the timing to 30 degrees before TDC (if my feeble memory is correct) with the engine turning at 3,000 RPM.  A Zenith-Stromberg owner could chime in here with the degrees before TDC and engine speed they use for timing.

Tom
74 TCS - 4605R
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: jbcollier on Monday,January 19, 2015, 04:46:15 PM
No need to disconnect the plug wires, simply remove the wire from the points at the coil.  Removing the spark plugs, however, will make it much easier to turn the engine over in small increments.

At this stage in the game, who the heck knows what distributer or cam you're running.  So go back to basics:

Set the timing at low idle (600 to 800) to 15° BTDC.  Rev the engine slowly up while observing the timing marks.  Go at least to 5K rpm, briefly mind!

- What was the maximum advance recorded?

- What is the maximum advance minus the initial advance of 15°.  This gives you the total advance of the distributor.

Basically, you want no more than 38° BTDC at high rpm if you tend to drive the car moderately.  If you drive the car hard and spend a great deal of time flat out at high rpm -- say up a mountain pass, flat out -- then I would reduce the maximum advance to 34° BTDC.

Let your low idle advance fall where it may.  Anywhere from 5° to 15° is ok.  Anything more or less than that may give you trouble.

Best practice is to send your distributor to someone with a distributor machine and have them set up the advance curve to match your cam/carb combination.  All of the above still follows though.
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: BDA on Monday,January 19, 2015, 05:08:03 PM
It is a little odd that static timing is specified. Dave Bean gave me instructions to initially set the timing statically - ~5o BTDC - just so it would start so the final timing could be set (27 - 30o BTDC @ 6000 rpm). I think the real timing is really the same as Tom's because I think all the advance is in by 3000 rpm). But the workshop manual doesn't specify a dynamic timing value so I would be inclined to leave it at the static spec but John has it really right (as usual). It looks like there is one distributor for Webers and one for Strombergs so I assume the difference in timing spec is because of the a different spark advance mechanism.
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: jbcollier on Monday,January 19, 2015, 06:26:19 PM
Dunno, if the Bean says 27° to 30° max for a TC, that's what I would do!
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: blasterdad on Monday,January 19, 2015, 06:38:34 PM


Second question is which direction do you rotate the distributor to retard the timing?

Joji Tokumoto
Turning the distributor into the direction of rotation of the rotor will advance the timing,
turning the distributor away from the direction of rotation of the rotor will retard the timing.
Think of it like this, if you were able to move the numbers on the face of a clock, by moving 12 to the left, the second hand would reach it sooner, to the right later...
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: BDA on Monday,January 19, 2015, 07:29:35 PM
Dunno, if the Bean says 27° to 30° max for a TC, that's what I would do!
I have a BDA, John, so my timing could be different from yours. It is interesting that Tom uses about the same timing. I suspect, but don't know, that different distributor advance mechanisms are a large part of any differences in timing.

If your experience tells you to go to 38o I'm sure that's a good setting for the TC with that distributor. Your earlier advice on setting the timing sounds about right to me.
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: jbcollier on Monday,January 19, 2015, 09:51:15 PM
I thought 27 - 30 was a bit conservative for a TC.  A BDA is an entirely different kettle of fish -- much more efficient combustion so not as much advance is required.
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: blasterdad on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 04:30:51 AM
I thought 27 - 30 was a bit conservative for a TC.  A BDA is an entirely different kettle of fish -- much more efficient combustion so not as much advance is required.
Please excuse my ignorance, but what is a BDA?, (besides our beloved member from NC). :confused:
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: jbcollier on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 05:42:12 AM
http://www.oocities.org/marty7_nz/bdaengine-index.html
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: BDA on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 06:21:50 AM
It's also basically the next iteration of the twin cam. It uses essentially the same block (it might differ in deck height) and it was developed when the twin cam was becoming less effective in rally cars.

John, of course, is correct that the combustion chamber is smaller and more efficient, but I would have thought that the determining factor for a street car would be the advance mechanism or curve of the distributor since the revs are lower.

Quote
(besides our beloved member from NC)
  :)
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: jbcollier on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 07:55:49 AM
Total advance required is based on the amount of time needed to burn the compressed mixture.  Old fashioned, hemi head designs with high compression, have a long thin combustion chamber that really slows down combustion.  Maximum timing advance could be as high as almost 50 degrees!  This is not efficient and results in tremendous amounts of heat being transferred to the piston and head.  For those reasons, most competition engines were dual plugged.

As an example I have a Ducati 250 desmo engine with between 12 and 13 to 1 compression.  With the stock single plug, the maximum timing is set to 40ish degrees.  Twin plugging reduces the maximum timing to 32 degrees.

Advance between idle and maximum advance is based on top end and cam design and is best set up on a dyno -- by someone who knows what they're doing (i.e. not me).
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: Grumblebuns on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 08:09:11 AM
Thanks for all of the good info. I'll get to trying to figure this out in the next couple of days. I'm sure I'll have more questions later. In my earlier days of ownership, I took the Europa to a mechanic for tune ups, never did it myself. thus my lack of knowledge.

Joji Tokumoto
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: BDA on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 08:15:27 AM
Quote
Advance between idle and maximum advance is based on top end and cam design and is best set up on a dyno -- by someone who knows what they're doing (i.e. not me).
Obviously not me either! Thanks for the good information, John.

My apologies for maybe taking us into the weeds from Joji's rather simple question. Hopefully some besides me found it enlightening.
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: blasterdad on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 04:03:39 PM
Quote
Advance between idle and maximum advance is based on top end and cam design and is best set up on a dyno -- by someone who knows what they're doing (i.e. not me).
Obviously not me either! Thanks for the good information, John.

My apologies for maybe taking us into the weeds from Joji's rather simple question. Hopefully some besides me found it enlightening.

I have, thanks guys!
Only problem is now that I know what a BDA is, I want one!  ;D  (OK, four!).  ::)
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: BDA on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 07:46:52 PM
blaster, would it help if I you knew how much they cost now? (Here's one that was nice at one time - nicer than mine - but now need block and head repair: http://www.race-cars.com/engsales/cosworth/1414985251/1414985251ss.htm) I was lucky and had mine built a long time ago when it was merely expensive. There are several people who have adapted the Toyota 4AGE (which is basically a Japanese BDA) to their Europas. It requires a bit of fabrication and wiring work, but it should be really good and a lot less expensive.  :)
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: blasterdad on Tuesday,January 20, 2015, 08:33:00 PM
 :huh:
WOW, you would think that after 2565 views someone would have snatched that up by now!  ::)
Even comes complete with melted cylinder head!  :o
I think I'll stick to the ol' Renault...  ;)
P.S.
Congrats on getting one while the gettin' was good!  8)
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: buzzer on Saturday,January 24, 2015, 01:28:04 PM
An expensive bit of furniture at $14k.
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: BDA on Saturday,January 24, 2015, 02:13:30 PM
I had heard that good (running) BDAs were going for about $20K+. I know the head can be fixed but I have no idea what it would cost. Of course you would then have to assemble it. I guess a lot of the price is for the alloy block which would be nice.

I don't think it makes sense to put the value of a finished Europa into the engine for that Europa, but thinking about it for a bit, I really pretty much did that - given the price of Europas in 1980 - and what I paid for my motor. But I had ended up with a head and a set of Dellortos so having a motor built with it seemed like the obvious thing to do. Also, it's a very straightforward engine swap that even I could do.
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: Grumblebuns on Thursday,February 12, 2015, 11:57:12 AM
Spent the morning getting close and personal with the TCS determining it's static timing. Following the directions of TCS4605R (Tom), I found my static timing to be 20 deg TDC. Through trial and error, moving the car back and forth while incrementally advancing the distributor got the static timing to 5 deg TDC as per the manual.

I was wondering if initially setting the timing marks at the flywheel to 5 deg TDC, then advancing the distributor to get the test light to light up would accomplish the same thing.

Second question, is finding the static timing point even necessary if the end goal is to set dynamic timing with the engine running?

The end result of finding the static timing point exercise is that I won't be afraid to pull the distributor out of the engine if I had to. Another kernel of knowledge in my personal knowledge base.

Joji Tokumoto   
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: EuropaTC on Thursday,February 12, 2015, 01:23:33 PM
Hi Joji,

Your first point - setting the flywheel then moving the distributor - well that's how I normally set static timing. I jack the wheel up and leave the car in gear because it's easier to move the wheel than a spanner on the front of the crankshaft. (which is what I do on the Elan, better access).

Then I remove the distributor cap so I can see the points, or in my current case the Pertronix, and move it so the light comes on. The reason I remove the cap is because once I set it on the "wrong" side of the cam - the points were closing not opening - and that didn't work so well. The other point is you're sure you have the rotor arm pointing at the right pole for #1 on the cap.

I've always used static timing and to be perfectly honest, when I check it with a light afterwards there's very little, if any, movement needed. Because I like to think of myself as a mechanic of course I always twiddle it a bit, but practically I think the car would run quite happily on the static settings.

Brian
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: TCS4605R on Thursday,February 12, 2015, 09:53:37 PM
BDA -  About ten years ago, I crewed for a Formula Atlantic Swift DB4 racing SCCA races.  At that time, a new engine cost about $25,000, a rebuild was $8,000 (built by Bruce Jennings on the West Coast of the USA).  They were fuel injected, developed around 240 HP and could run about 8 hours of track time before an engine rebuild was needed.  The rev limit was 10,800 RPM.  Very neat engine, so yours was a bargain.

What type of gearbox are you using with the Cosworth BDA and do you use the standard Lotus rear suspension?

Tom
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: BDA on Friday,February 13, 2015, 06:55:23 AM
Tom,

Mine is certainly not a race engine - though it was balanced, blueprinted, ported, and dyno'd. Of course, mine uses Webers rather than injection. I'm not quite sure, but in our discussions, I thought Dave mentioned that mine was a "small valve" head it came off an Escort). I don't know if there were two versions of the head or opening up the valves was part of the preparation for the race motors. You might know more of the particulars about that.

I elected to use a cast crank. Dave offered a steel one to me for an additional $500 but I declined. Who would do a stupid thing like that? Well, it was 10% of the cost of the engine and Dave said it would only give me 1000 rpm. I don't think it was a race crank because I knew Atlantic drivers who twisted their motors to 9500. Dave said to keep the redline at 7500 and I thought that was plenty for a street engine. As for the price, keep in mind all this happened thirty five years ago!

Jennings has (or had) been building great motors for a long time, but my buddies who raced Atlantic generally used Grimaldi. Eight hours doesn't seem like much, but at almost 11000 rpm, I guess that's to be expected.

I'm using an NG-3 gearbox and Richard's twin link rear suspension with his rear disc brake kit.
Title: Re: Timing the twin cam
Post by: Grumblebuns on Friday,February 13, 2015, 07:34:15 AM
Hi Joji,

Your first point - setting the flywheel then moving the distributor - well that's how I normally set static timing. I jack the wheel up and leave the car in gear because it's easier to move the wheel than a spanner on the front of the crankshaft. (which is what I do on the Elan, better access).

Then I remove the distributor cap so I can see the points, or in my current case the Pertronix, and move it so the light comes on. The reason I remove the cap is because once I set it on the "wrong" side of the cam - the points were closing not opening - and that didn't work so well. The other point is you're sure you have the rotor arm pointing at the right pole for #1 on the cap.

I've always used static timing and to be perfectly honest, when I check it with a light afterwards there's very little, if any, movement needed. Because I like to think of myself as a mechanic of course I always twiddle it a bit, but practically I think the car would run quite happily on the static settings.

Brian

Thanks Brian, pushing the car back and forth wasn't too bad of an ordeal but I thought there may be a better way. I haven't started up the car since I set the static timing and plan on doing another road test once the weather cools down a bit. We've been above 80 deg F for the last couple of days.

Joji Tokumoto