Author Topic: Sacrificial Zinc Anode  (Read 1851 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BDA

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Jul 2012
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Posts: 9,473
Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« on: Friday,July 21, 2017, 10:51:11 AM »
I don't see this discussed much but I've recently been advised to install a sacrificial zinc anode to protect the aluminum head and aluminum radiator from corrosion. I did a search and found some discussion on the topic. There seems to be a little contrary opinion - some saying that modern antifreezes perform the same function, but I wonder if it makes sense to install an anode in any case just to be safe.

I am currently using distilled water and Redline's Waterwetter - actually, I'm transitioning to that so I still have some antifreeze - and the Redline tech assured me that it was Waterwetter guarded against corrosion. In spite of that, I'm considering adding a sacrificial zinc anode just to make sure.
« Last Edit: Friday,July 21, 2017, 10:59:15 AM by BDA »

Offline andy harwood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Joined: Sep 2012
  • Location: eden, nc usa
  • Posts: 532
Re: Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« Reply #1 on: Friday,July 21, 2017, 11:29:55 AM »
well, we used a copper anode to help with the flavor on coors light... :beerchug:

Offline LotusJoe

  • Twink Driver
  • Administrator
  • Super Member
  • **
  • Joined: Apr 2012
  • Location: Southern California
  • Posts: 938
  • Forum Administrator
    • LotusEuropa.org
Re: Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« Reply #2 on: Friday,July 21, 2017, 11:34:26 AM »
Alloy heads and cast blocks are a pretty common combination. I use a good phosphate free antifreeze. Most of the auto manufactures have them. I either use Mercedes Benz or Audi. But there are good ones at your local autoparts store. I usually make sure it says "Phosphate Free". The anode your referencing is commonly used on marine applications, so it does do it's job. I would think, if this was a major issue, we would see anodes on most cars as alloy and iron is pretty common place. Annual cooling flush is usually the best way to insure corrosion is kept to a minimum.   
Joe Irwin
3927R TC Special
(The Classic Barn Find)


Offline BDA

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Jul 2012
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Posts: 9,473
Re: Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« Reply #3 on: Friday,July 21, 2017, 12:14:38 PM »
Thanks John.


I found this article on this topic that seems authoritative and might be pertinent given that many of us are likely in a similar situation to a hotrodders: http://www.hotrod.com/articles/keep-your-cool-preventing-radiator-eating-electrolysis/

Offline jbcollier

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Nov 2013
  • Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Posts: 5,800
Re: Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« Reply #4 on: Friday,July 21, 2017, 02:39:03 PM »
Use antifreeze recommended for alloy engines in the recommended mix ratio.  It prevents corrosion and raises the boiling temp: both very useful things.  Antifreeze's corrosion resistance declines with time so replace as recommended by the manufacturer.

Offline EuropaTC

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Jun 2012
  • Location: Lincolnshire, UK
  • Posts: 2,999
    • LotusLand
Re: Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« Reply #5 on: Friday,July 21, 2017, 10:07:24 PM »
Use antifreeze recommended for alloy engines in the recommended mix ratio.  It prevents corrosion and raises the boiling temp: both very useful things.  Antifreeze's corrosion resistance declines with time so replace as recommended by the manufacturer.

I'm with John on this one, definitely keep it simple and known technology. The zinc anode idea has great appeal at first sight but it's not so simple as just bolting a lump of zinc onto the target area.

/boring geek mode/   :)

Galvanic protection (other terms available) is very much dependant on the position of the anode/cathode in the galvanic series (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_series ), the electrolyte and relative surface areas.   It's got nothing to do with how hard or soft the metal is as inferred to in the hotrod article and although it might sound conceited, I'm skeptical of some of the logic/terminology used there.

I'm not sure on modern terminology but we used to refer to "throwing power" as the area protected by an anode.  Basically, if you bolt a lump of zinc onto a mild steel plate in a conducting liquid then the area immediately adjacent to the zinc is very well protected because the current flow between the zinc/steel is high.  The further you go away from the zinc the wider the area to protect and lower the beneficial current. At some point you end up with not enough current to protect the steel and it rusts. Galvanic protection often requires more than one anode to give complete protection but in properly designed applications or  galvanised steel, it is very good.

It's one of those things which look very simple but often requires more consideration than you might first think.  When I was working we used systems like this on some pipelines because it's easily monitored, but it wasn't a universal application. The most common I knew of was on boats and that's well sorted, I wouldn't be surprised if you couldn't just dial in the hull size and read off the number, size and placement of anodes from a list in a shop.

But as for a system to protect a cylinder head, I'm not sure where I'd start. It's certainly do-able but I'd have no idea of the size or location of zinc anodes and I'd guess we'd need more than one to balance the system.

So I'm with John and keep with antifreeze which is basically corrosion protection via water treatment.  It's 100% effective when done properly and reaches every nook & cranny in your engine - wherever the water goes, protection follows. Service life depends on the concentration or type of chemicals used for protection because, as you might expect, they get depleted due to chemical reaction over time. Your antifreeze might still not freeze at -20C but it could have run out of corrosion protection, so I tend to follow the recommendations on the tin for changing.

Offline BDA

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Jul 2012
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Posts: 9,473
Re: Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« Reply #6 on: Saturday,July 22, 2017, 05:46:36 AM »
Good discussion, guys! Thanks!

Offline rascott

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Joined: Dec 2014
  • Location: california
  • Posts: 249
Re: Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« Reply #7 on: Saturday,July 22, 2017, 07:18:19 AM »
my "original" radiator cap had a zinc hanging off of it.
the replacement did not......

Offline BDA

  • Super Member
  • *******
  • Joined: Jul 2012
  • Location: North Carolina
  • Posts: 9,473
Re: Sacrificial Zinc Anode
« Reply #8 on: Saturday,July 22, 2017, 04:57:54 PM »
I've seen those and I am led to understand that for the anode to be effective, it has to be in physical contact with the piece the anode is supposed to protect and so those aren't really effective.


I'm convinced by John's and Brian's posts. I think I will ground my radiator, though.